Let me get something off my chest: I
hate engineering. I really hate
engineering...school. In the past year, I have been asked to do
numerous assignments from various professors that amounts to no more
than busywork. ONCE this year I have been asked to create something,
and that was in a non-engineering class. My Chem 167 (chemistry for
engineers) professor once stated that he was glad that we were
becoming engineers instead of business majors because “we've got
too many people selling things in this country, and not enough
building them” - or something to that effect. But there lies the
problem with the program I am currently enrolled in, I haven't been
asked to create anything this year.
Freshman year was
actually a lot different. One of my favorite professors, Dana
Haugli, did his utmost to try and tie the concepts we were learning
to things we were creating – in his classes. First semester he had
us do group projects where we built rockets, then had us write a
computer program where we modeled what was happening when the rocket
flew. I did exceptional in that class. Second semester, we were
again asked to get into groups and try to build a model airplane from
foam (among other things). Our team's model didn't go so well,
narrowly avoiding a soccer goal post before breaking itself upon the
ground. But we were asked to create and test something. I also did
well in this class, as well as most of the other classes I was
enrolled in at the time.
Sophomore
year in engineering college sucks, there is no other way to put it.
Lots of theories, pointless memorizations, and looking through
endless notes to find complex, archaic equations. I heard our new
department head of Aerospace Engineering, Richard Wlezien say it, and
I agree: “there's no reason that we should be learning the same
things now that we taught fifty years ago.” It's true: the
Kutta-Joukowski theorem dates back to the early 1900s. Bernoulli's
equation dates back to 1738. I'm not saying that these are not
relevant or that we shouldn't understand them, but we should look at
them the same way we look at a rotary phone or a rangefinder camera –
wow, that's clever – for it's time.
I went to an
aerospace conference last year, AIAA region 5, and besides getting a
major case of education envy (the guys at the Air Force Academy get
to do some really cool things), I heard from a guy that works at
Rockwell Collins. I overheard him say that to work for Rockwell
Collins today, you would need at least a four year degree in
engineering. He was a fairly important person at Rockwell, despite
having a two year degree in electronics.
The sad part about
this whole thing is that I still think that a career in engineering
could be enjoyable and rewarding. The only problem is that I've had
a taste of what a creative job can be, and it's awesome. Addicting,
really. I am so much more confident in my skills as a
photographer than as an Aerospace Engineer. I feel like if I
interviewed at an aerospace firm and a photography studio tomorrow, I
would be more likely to get the photography position, just because I
want to.
Now I understand
that I would be entering a relatively saturated job market, versus
engineering, where I'm told that there are more positions than people
to fill them (hasn't been my exact experience, yet). However, I feel
like I will be more likely to succeed in a place where I have to push
myself. The other thing is, if it doesn't work out, and I decide to
become an Aerospace Engineer, I can come back and see if Richard has
changed the program for the better.
No comments:
Post a Comment